Acura ADX FWD vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC

2026 Acura ADX FWD studio car image
Acura

ADX FWD

2026 · Petrol Suv

Comparison winners

3 metrics
Power winner Acura ADX FWD 190 hp Runner-up: 181 hp
Cargo winner Acura ADX FWD 691 L Runner-up: 472 L
Price winner Acura ADX FWD $35,000 Runner-up: $36,190

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Acura ADX FWD against the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use petrol powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Acura ADX FWD has the higher listed output at 190 hp; 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC is rated at 181 hp, a difference of 9 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC at 245 Nm and 2026 Acura ADX FWD at 243 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Acura ADX FWD has the lower recorded consumption at 8.4 L/100km; 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC is listed at 9.0 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Acura ADX FWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 691 litres versus 472 litres, a difference of 219 litres. 2026 Acura ADX FWD is 9 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2026 Acura ADX FWD has the lower listed starting price at $35,000, compared with $36,190 for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC. 2026 Acura ADX FWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Acura ADX FWD2026 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC2025
Performance
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top Speed185 km/h
Power190 hp181 hp
Torque243 Nm245 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Fuel Tank53 L60 L
Efficiency8.4 L/100km9 L/100km
CO2 Emissions206 g/km
Size & Capacity
Length4,719 mm4,710 mm
Ground Clearance185 mm210 mm
Cargo691 L472 L
Curb Weight1,528 kg1,750 kg
Towing907 kg
Seats57
Turning Circle11.3 m10.8 m
Starting MSRP$35,000$36,190

Acura ADX FWD vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC questions answered

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Acura ADX FWD or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC?

2026 Acura ADX FWD has more power at 190 hp, a 9 hp advantage over 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Acura ADX FWD or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC?

2026 Acura ADX FWD has more listed cargo space at 691 litres (24.4 cu ft), versus 472 litres (16.7 cu ft).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Acura ADX FWD or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC is heavier at 1,750 kg (3,858 lb), while 2026 Acura ADX FWD is listed at 1,528 kg (3,369 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Acura ADX FWD or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC?

2026 Acura ADX FWD has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $35,000 USD, compared with $36,190 USD for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Acura ADX FWD or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC?

2026 Acura ADX FWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.