Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.1 seconds, compared with 5.5 seconds for 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the higher listed output at 346 hp; 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is rated at 340 hp, a difference of 6 hp. Both specifications list 580 Nm of torque. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 530 km, against 480 km for 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD. 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 17.7 kWh/100km; 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is listed at 18.4 kWh/100km. Both list the same maximum DC charging power of 150 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 769 litres versus 519 litres, a difference of 250 litres. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD carries the higher towing rating at 750 kg, while 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is listed at 680 kg. 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is 98 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has the lower listed starting price at $43,900, compared with $49,500 for 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.