Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225 has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 7.5 seconds, compared with 8.5 seconds for 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD. 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD has the higher listed output at 265 hp; 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225 is rated at 225 hp, a difference of 40 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD at 367 Nm and 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225 at 360 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD carries the longer listed range at 62 km, against 55 km for 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225. 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 1.2 L/100km; 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225 is listed at 1.5 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 558 litres versus 460 litres, a difference of 98 litres. 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD carries the higher towing rating at 1,350 kg, while 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225 is listed at 1,250 kg. The two cars share the same recorded overall length of 4,500 mm. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD has the lower listed starting price at $40,150, compared with $41,800 for 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225. 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.