Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD vs Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX 6.0 s Runner-up: 6.4 s
Range winner Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD 602 km Runner-up: 75 km
Power winner Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX 306 hp Runner-up: 286 hp
Cargo winner Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX 490 L Runner-up: 450 L
Price winner Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX $49,900 Runner-up: $49,995

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD against the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. One uses a battery-electric powertrain and the other a plug-in hybrid system, so range and consumption figures need to be read in that context.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 6.0 seconds, compared with 6.4 seconds for 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD. 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX has the higher listed output at 306 hp; 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD is rated at 286 hp, a difference of 20 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD at 545 Nm and 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX at 227 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD carries the longer listed range at 602 km, against 75 km for 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 490 litres versus 450 litres, a difference of 40 litres. 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD carries the higher towing rating at 1,000 kg, while 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX is listed at 750 kg. 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX is 167 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX has the lower listed starting price at $49,900, compared with $49,995 for 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD. 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX2025
Performance
0-100 km/h6.4 s6.0 s
Top Speed180 km/h180 km/h
Power286 hp306 hp
Torque545 Nm227 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range602 km75 km
Battery82 kWh18.1 kWh
Fuel Tank—43 L
Efficiency13.6 kWh/100km1.1 L/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km22 g/km
DC Charging185 kW—
Size & Capacity
Length4,468 mm4,635 mm
Ground Clearance164 mm185 mm
Cargo450 L490 L
Curb Weight2,037 kg1,910 kg
Towing1,000 kg750 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle10.7 m10.8 m
Starting MSRP$49,995$49,900

Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD vs Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 6.0 seconds, versus 6.4 seconds for 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

Both cars have the same listed top speed of 180 km/h, approximately 112 mph.

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX has more power at 306 hp, a 20 hp advantage over 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD.

Which has more range, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD has the longer listed range at 602 km (374 miles), versus 75 km (47 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD has the larger listed battery at 82.0 kWh, compared with 18.1 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX has more listed cargo space at 490 litres (17.3 cu ft), versus 450 litres (15.9 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD has the higher listed towing capacity at 1,000 kg (2,205 lb), compared with 750 kg (1,653 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD is heavier at 2,037 kg (4,491 lb), while 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX is listed at 1,910 kg (4,211 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $49,900 USD, compared with $49,995 USD for 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Ford Explorer EV Long Range RWD or the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX?

2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.