Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD vs Kia Niro EV Wind

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD 5.1 s Runner-up: 7.8 s
Range winner Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD 530 km Runner-up: 460 km
Power winner Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD 346 hp Runner-up: 204 hp
Cargo winner Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD 519 L Runner-up: 475 L
Price winner Kia Niro EV Wind $40,875 Runner-up: $49,500

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD against the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.1 seconds, compared with 7.8 seconds for 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the higher listed output at 346 hp; 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind is rated at 204 hp, a difference of 142 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD at 580 Nm and 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind at 255 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 530 km, against 460 km for 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind. 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind has the lower recorded consumption at 14.1 kWh/100km; 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is listed at 18.4 kWh/100km. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 150 kW, compared with 80 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 519 litres versus 475 litres, a difference of 44 litres. Their listed towing capacities are equal at 750 kg. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is 319 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Kia Niro EV Wind has the lower listed starting price at $40,875, compared with $49,500 for 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD2026 Kia Niro EV Wind2025
Performance
0-100 km/h5.1 s7.8 s
Top Speed180 km/h167 km/h
Power346 hp204 hp
Torque580 Nm255 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range530 km460 km
Battery98.7 kWh64.8 kWh
Efficiency18.4 kWh/100km14.1 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging150 kW80 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,739 mm4,420 mm
Ground Clearance150 mm160 mm
Cargo519 L475 L
Curb Weight2,260 kg1,757 kg
Towing750 kg750 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle11.6 m10.6 m
Starting MSRP$49,500$40,875

Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD vs Kia Niro EV Wind questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 5.1 seconds, versus 7.8 seconds for 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the higher listed top speed at 180 km/h (112 mph), compared with 167 km/h (104 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has more power at 346 hp, a 142 hp advantage over 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind.

Which has more range, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the longer listed range at 530 km (329 miles), versus 460 km (286 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the larger listed battery at 98.7 kWh, compared with 64.8 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has more listed cargo space at 519 litres (18.3 cu ft), versus 475 litres (16.8 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

Both cars have the same listed towing capacity of 750 kg (1,653 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is heavier at 2,260 kg (4,982 lb), while 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind is listed at 1,757 kg (3,874 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

2025 Kia Niro EV Wind has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $40,875 USD, compared with $49,500 USD for 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.