Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh vs Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD 5.5 s Runner-up: 7.8 s
Range winner Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh 490 km Runner-up: 480 km
Power winner Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD 340 hp Runner-up: 218 hp
Cargo winner Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD 769 L Runner-up: 466 L
Price winner Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh $35,550 Runner-up: $43,900

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh against the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.5 seconds, compared with 7.8 seconds for 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh. 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has the higher listed output at 340 hp; 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh is rated at 218 hp, a difference of 122 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD at 580 Nm and 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh at 255 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh carries the longer listed range at 490 km, against 480 km for 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the lower recorded consumption at 13.3 kWh/100km; 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is listed at 17.7 kWh/100km. 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 150 kW, compared with 102 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 769 litres versus 466 litres, a difference of 303 litres. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh carries the higher towing rating at 750 kg, while 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is listed at 680 kg. 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is 482 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the lower listed starting price at $35,550, compared with $43,900 for 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD. The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh2025 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD2026
Performance
0-100 km/h7.8 s5.5 s
Top Speed170 km/h190 km/h
Power218 hp340 hp
Torque255 Nm580 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range490 km480 km
Battery65.4 kWh85 kWh
Efficiency13.3 kWh/100km17.7 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging102 kW150 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,355 mm4,837 mm
Ground Clearance178 mm185 mm
Cargo466 L769 L
Curb Weight1,720 kg2,200 kg
Towing750 kg680 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle10.6 m12.2 m
Starting MSRP$35,550$43,900

Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh vs Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 5.5 seconds, versus 7.8 seconds for 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has the higher listed top speed at 190 km/h (118 mph), compared with 170 km/h (106 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has more power at 340 hp, a 122 hp advantage over 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh.

Which has more range, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the longer listed range at 490 km (304 miles), versus 480 km (298 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has the larger listed battery at 85.0 kWh, compared with 65.4 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has more listed cargo space at 769 litres (27.2 cu ft), versus 466 litres (16.5 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the higher listed towing capacity at 750 kg (1,653 lb), compared with 680 kg (1,499 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is heavier at 2,200 kg (4,850 lb), while 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh is listed at 1,720 kg (3,792 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $35,550 USD, compared with $43,900 USD for 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh or the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD?

The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.