Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.3 seconds, compared with 7.8 seconds for 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh. 2026 Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range has the higher listed output at 272 hp; 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh is rated at 218 hp, a difference of 54 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range at 343 Nm and 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh at 255 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh carries the longer listed range at 490 km, against 483 km for 2026 Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the lower recorded consumption at 13.3 kWh/100km; 2026 Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range is listed at 14.3 kWh/100km. 2026 Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 153 kW, compared with 102 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 466 litres versus 318 litres, a difference of 148 litres. 2026 Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range carries the higher towing rating at 1,000 kg, while 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh is listed at 750 kg. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh is 122 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the lower listed starting price at $35,550, compared with $36,745 for 2026 Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range. The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.