Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
Both cars record the same 0-100 km/h time of 7.0 seconds. 2025 Ford Bronco Badlands 2.7L V6 4-Door has the higher listed output at 330 hp; 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo is rated at 256 hp, a difference of 74 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Ford Bronco Badlands 2.7L V6 4-Door at 563 Nm and 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo at 434 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo has the lower recorded consumption at 9.4 L/100km; 2025 Ford Bronco Badlands 2.7L V6 4-Door is listed at 12.4 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Ford Bronco Badlands 2.7L V6 4-Door provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 628 litres versus 572 litres, a difference of 56 litres. Their listed towing capacities are equal at 1,588 kg. 2025 Ford Bronco Badlands 2.7L V6 4-Door is 73 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo has the lower listed starting price at $40,900, compared with $48,615 for 2025 Ford Bronco Badlands 2.7L V6 4-Door. 2025 Ford Bronco Badlands 2.7L V6 4-Door leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.