Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura vs Volvo XC90 T8 AWD

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Volvo XC90 T8 AWD 5.4 s Runner-up: 5.8 s
Range winner Volvo XC90 T8 AWD 68 km Runner-up: 63 km
Power winner Volvo XC90 T8 AWD 455 hp Runner-up: 327 hp
Cargo winner Volvo XC90 T8 AWD 680 L Runner-up: 570 L
Price winner Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura $52,500 Runner-up: $60,990

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura against the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use plug-in hybrid powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.4 seconds, compared with 5.8 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura. 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD has the higher listed output at 455 hp; 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura is rated at 327 hp, a difference of 128 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD at 709 Nm and 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura at 500 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD carries the longer listed range at 68 km, against 63 km for 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the lower recorded consumption at 1.5 L/100km; 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD is listed at 2.5 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 680 litres versus 570 litres, a difference of 110 litres. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura carries the higher towing rating at 2,500 kg, while 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD is listed at 2,250 kg. 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD is 205 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the lower listed starting price at $52,500, compared with $60,990 for 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD. 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD2025
Performance
0-100 km/h5.8 s5.4 s
Top Speed200 km/h180 km/h
Power327 hp455 hp
Torque500 Nm709 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range63 km68 km
Battery17.8 kWh18.8 kWh
Fuel Tank50 L60 L
Efficiency1.5 L/100km2.5 L/100km
CO2 Emissions33 g/km57 g/km
DC Charging—0 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,745 mm4,950 mm
Ground Clearance195 mm210 mm
Cargo570 L680 L
Curb Weight2,065 kg2,330 kg
Towing2,500 kg2,250 kg
Seats57
Turning Circle11.3 m12.0 m
Starting MSRP$52,500$60,990

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura vs Volvo XC90 T8 AWD questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 5.4 seconds, versus 5.8 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the higher listed top speed at 200 km/h (124 mph), compared with 180 km/h (112 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD has more power at 455 hp, a 128 hp advantage over 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura.

Which has more range, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD has the longer listed range at 68 km (42 miles), versus 63 km (39 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD has the larger listed battery at 18.8 kWh, compared with 17.8 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD has more listed cargo space at 680 litres (24.0 cu ft), versus 570 litres (20.1 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the higher listed towing capacity at 2,500 kg (5,512 lb), compared with 2,250 kg (4,960 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD is heavier at 2,330 kg (5,137 lb), while 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura is listed at 2,065 kg (4,553 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $52,500 USD, compared with $60,990 USD for 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD?

2025 Volvo XC90 T8 AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.