Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium vs Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium
6.5 s
Runner-up: 7.1 s
Power winner
Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium
340 hp
Runner-up: 252 hp
Cargo winner
Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
413 L
Runner-up: 400 L
Price winner
Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
$39,200
Runner-up: $48,000
Key differences
- Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium is quicker from 0-100 km/h (6.5 s vs 7.1 s).
- Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium has more power (340 hp vs 252 hp).
- Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range has more cargo volume (413 L vs 400 L).
- Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range has the lower starting MSRP ($39,200 vs $48,000).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power | 340 hp | 252 hp |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | — | 540 km |
| Battery | — | 82 kWh |
| Fuel Tank | 68 L | — |
| Efficiency | 9.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 224 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | — | 200 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 5,099 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 201 mm | 171 mm |
| Cargo | 400 L | 413 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,100 kg | 2,020 kg |
| Towing | 2,268 kg | 1,500 kg |
| Seats | 8 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 12.0 m | 11.4 m |
| Starting MSRP | $48,000 | $39,200 |
