Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium vs Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
3.6 s
Runner-up: 6.5 s
Power winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
428 hp
Runner-up: 340 hp
Cargo winner
Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium
400 L
Runner-up: 318 L
Price winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
$41,200
Runner-up: $48,000
Key differences
- Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is quicker from 0-100 km/h (3.6 s vs 6.5 s).
- Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance has more power (428 hp vs 340 hp).
- Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium has more cargo volume (400 L vs 318 L).
- Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance has the lower starting MSRP ($41,200 vs $48,000).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5 s | 3.6 s |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power | 340 hp | 428 hp |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 543 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | — | 438 km |
| Battery | — | 69 kWh |
| Fuel Tank | 68 L | — |
| Efficiency | 9.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 224 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | — | 153 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 5,099 mm | 4,233 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 201 mm | 175 mm |
| Cargo | 400 L | 318 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,100 kg | 1,900 kg |
| Towing | 2,268 kg | 1,000 kg |
| Seats | 8 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 12.0 m | 10.6 m |
| Starting MSRP | $48,000 | $41,200 |
