Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ vs Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD

2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ studio car image
Mercedes-Benz

EQA 250+

2026 · Electric Suv

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 4.8 s Runner-up: 8.6 s
Range winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 574 km Runner-up: 528 km
Power winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 351 hp Runner-up: 190 hp
Cargo winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 854 L Runner-up: 340 L
Price winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD $45,990 Runner-up: $50,600

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ against the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 4.8 seconds, compared with 8.6 seconds for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed output at 351 hp; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ is rated at 190 hp, a difference of 161 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD at 493 Nm and 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ at 385 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 574 km, against 528 km for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 14.7 kWh/100km; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ is listed at 15.7 kWh/100km. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 250 kW, compared with 100 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 854 litres versus 340 litres, a difference of 514 litres. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD carries the higher towing rating at 1,600 kg, while 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ is listed at 750 kg. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is 334 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower listed starting price at $45,990, compared with $50,600 for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD2026
Performance
0-100 km/h8.6 s4.8 s
Top Speed160 km/h201 km/h
Power190 hp351 hp
Torque385 Nm493 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range528 km574 km
Battery70.5 kWh78.1 kWh
Efficiency15.7 kWh/100km14.7 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging100 kW250 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,463 mm4,797 mm
Ground Clearance168 mm175 mm
Cargo340 L854 L
Curb Weight2,040 kg2,003 kg
Towing750 kg1,600 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle11.4 m11.6 m
Starting MSRP$50,600$45,990

Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ vs Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 4.8 seconds, versus 8.6 seconds for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed top speed at 201 km/h (125 mph), compared with 160 km/h (99 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has more power at 351 hp, a 161 hp advantage over 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+.

Which has more range, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the longer listed range at 574 km (357 miles), versus 528 km (328 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the larger listed battery at 78.1 kWh, compared with 70.5 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has more listed cargo space at 854 litres (30.2 cu ft), versus 340 litres (12.0 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed towing capacity at 1,600 kg (3,527 lb), compared with 750 kg (1,653 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ is heavier at 2,040 kg (4,497 lb), while 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is listed at 2,003 kg (4,416 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $45,990 USD, compared with $50,600 USD for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.