Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD vs Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 4.8 s Runner-up: 5.6 s
Range winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 574 km Runner-up: 498 km
Power winner Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro 408 hp Runner-up: 351 hp
Cargo winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 854 L Runner-up: 569 L
Price winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD $45,990 Runner-up: $75,200

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD against the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 4.8 seconds, compared with 5.6 seconds for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has the higher listed output at 408 hp; 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is rated at 351 hp, a difference of 57 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro at 664 Nm and 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD at 493 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 574 km, against 498 km for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 14.7 kWh/100km; 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is listed at 19.8 kWh/100km. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 250 kW, compared with 170 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 854 litres versus 569 litres, a difference of 285 litres. 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro carries the higher towing rating at 2,500 kg, while 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is listed at 1,600 kg. 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is 118 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower listed starting price at $45,990, compared with $75,200 for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro2026
Performance
0-100 km/h4.8 s5.6 s
Top Speed201 km/h200 km/h
Power351 hp408 hp
Torque493 Nm664 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range574 km498 km
Battery78.1 kWh106 kWh
Efficiency14.7 kWh/100km19.8 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging250 kW170 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,797 mm4,915 mm
Ground Clearance175 mm172 mm
Cargo854 L569 L
Curb Weight2,003 kg2,595 kg
Towing1,600 kg2,500 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle11.6 m12.2 m
Starting MSRP$45,990$75,200

Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD vs Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 4.8 seconds, versus 5.6 seconds for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed top speed at 201 km/h (125 mph), compared with 200 km/h (124 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has more power at 408 hp, a 57 hp advantage over 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD.

Which has more range, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the longer listed range at 574 km (357 miles), versus 498 km (309 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has the larger listed battery at 106.0 kWh, compared with 78.1 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has more listed cargo space at 854 litres (30.2 cu ft), versus 569 litres (20.1 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has the higher listed towing capacity at 2,500 kg (5,512 lb), compared with 1,600 kg (3,527 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is heavier at 2,595 kg (5,721 lb), while 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is listed at 2,003 kg (4,416 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $45,990 USD, compared with $75,200 USD for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.