Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.3 seconds, compared with 4.0 seconds for 2026 Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance. 2026 Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance has the higher listed output at 680 hp; 2026 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack is rated at 670 hp, a difference of 10 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance at 870 Nm and 2026 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack at 868 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2026 Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance carries the longer listed range at 702 km, against 397 km for 2026 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack. 2026 Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance has the lower recorded consumption at 16.7 kWh/100km; 2026 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack is listed at 25.3 kWh/100km. 2026 Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 350 kW, compared with 150 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 481 litres versus 464 litres, a difference of 17 litres. 2026 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack is 60 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.