Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro vs Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD 5.2 s Runner-up: 5.6 s
Range winner Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD 570 km Runner-up: 498 km
Power winner Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro 408 hp Runner-up: 380 hp
Cargo winner Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD 620 L Runner-up: 569 L
Price winner Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD $56,675 Runner-up: $75,200

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro against the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.2 seconds, compared with 5.6 seconds for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has the higher listed output at 408 hp; 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD is rated at 380 hp, a difference of 28 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD at 700 Nm and 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro at 664 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 570 km, against 498 km for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 19.3 kWh/100km; 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is listed at 19.8 kWh/100km. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 350 kW, compared with 170 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 620 litres versus 569 litres, a difference of 51 litres. Their listed towing capacities are equal at 2,500 kg. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD is 145 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the lower listed starting price at $56,675, compared with $75,200 for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD2025
Performance
0-100 km/h5.6 s5.2 s
Top Speed200 km/h200 km/h
Power408 hp380 hp
Torque664 Nm700 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range498 km570 km
Battery106 kWh110.3 kWh
Efficiency19.8 kWh/100km19.3 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging170 kW350 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,915 mm5,060 mm
Ground Clearance172 mm178 mm
Cargo569 L620 L
Curb Weight2,595 kg2,590 kg
Towing2,500 kg2,500 kg
Seats57
Turning Circle12.2 m12.8 m
Starting MSRP$75,200$56,675

Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro vs Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 5.2 seconds, versus 5.6 seconds for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

Both cars have the same listed top speed of 200 km/h, approximately 124 mph.

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has more power at 408 hp, a 28 hp advantage over 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD.

Which has more range, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the longer listed range at 570 km (354 miles), versus 498 km (309 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the larger listed battery at 110.3 kWh, compared with 106.0 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has more listed cargo space at 620 litres (21.9 cu ft), versus 569 litres (20.1 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

Both cars have the same listed towing capacity of 2,500 kg (5,512 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is heavier at 2,595 kg (5,721 lb), while 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD is listed at 2,590 kg (5,710 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $56,675 USD, compared with $75,200 USD for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro or the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD?

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.