Audi RS3 Sportback vs Polestar 5 Performance

Comparison winners

3 metrics
0-100 winner Polestar 5 Performance 3.2 s Runner-up: 3.7 s
Power winner Polestar 5 Performance 884 hp Runner-up: 407 hp
Cargo winner Polestar 5 Performance 365 L Runner-up: 282 L

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback against the 2026 Polestar 5 Performance. Both belong to the sedan class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. One uses a petrol powertrain and the other a battery-electric system, so range and consumption figures need to be read in that context.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Polestar 5 Performance has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.2 seconds, compared with 3.7 seconds for 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback. 2026 Polestar 5 Performance has the higher listed output at 884 hp; 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback is rated at 407 hp, a difference of 477 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Polestar 5 Performance at 1,015 Nm and 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback at 500 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

Range and energy-use figures are either not shared by both cars or not directly comparable across these powertrain types.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Polestar 5 Performance provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 365 litres versus 282 litres, a difference of 83 litres. 2026 Polestar 5 Performance is 706 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2026 Polestar 5 Performance leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Audi RS3 Sportback2026 Polestar 5 Performance2026
Performance
0-100 km/h3.7 s3.2 s
Top Speed300 km/h250 km/h
Power407 hp884 hp
Torque500 Nm1,015 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range558 km
Battery112 kWh
Fuel Tank50 L
Efficiency9.1 L/100km21.2 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions208 g/km0 g/km
Size & Capacity
Length4,381 mm5,087 mm
Ground Clearance128 mm141 mm
Cargo282 L365 L
Curb Weight1,575 kg2,500 kg
Towing1,800 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle10.9 m12.3 m
Starting MSRP$65,500

Audi RS3 Sportback vs Polestar 5 Performance questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback or the 2026 Polestar 5 Performance?

2026 Polestar 5 Performance is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 3.2 seconds, versus 3.7 seconds for 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback or the 2026 Polestar 5 Performance?

2026 Audi RS3 Sportback has the higher listed top speed at 300 km/h (186 mph), compared with 250 km/h (155 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback or the 2026 Polestar 5 Performance?

2026 Polestar 5 Performance has more power at 884 hp, a 477 hp advantage over 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback or the 2026 Polestar 5 Performance?

2026 Polestar 5 Performance has more listed cargo space at 365 litres (12.9 cu ft), versus 282 litres (10.0 cu ft).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback or the 2026 Polestar 5 Performance?

2026 Polestar 5 Performance is heavier at 2,500 kg (5,512 lb), while 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback is listed at 1,575 kg (3,472 lb).

Which is better, the 2026 Audi RS3 Sportback or the 2026 Polestar 5 Performance?

2026 Polestar 5 Performance leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.