Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.7 seconds, compared with 7.8 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D. 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e has the higher listed output at 389 hp; 2025 Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is rated at 254 hp, a difference of 135 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e at 600 Nm and 2025 Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D at 550 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
Range and energy-use figures are either not shared by both cars or not directly comparable across these powertrain types.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 500 litres versus 258 litres, a difference of 242 litres. 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e carries the higher towing rating at 2,700 kg, while 2025 Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is listed at 2,500 kg. 2025 Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is 73 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has the lower listed starting price at $52,500, compared with $68,395 for 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e. 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.