Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 4.9 seconds, compared with 5.6 seconds for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury has the higher listed output at 750 hp; 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is rated at 408 hp, a difference of 342 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury at 1,064 Nm and 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro at 664 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro carries the longer listed range at 498 km, against 460 km for 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury. 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has the lower recorded consumption at 19.8 kWh/100km; 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury is listed at 43.5 kWh/100km. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 350 kW, compared with 170 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 729 litres versus 569 litres, a difference of 160 litres. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury carries the higher towing rating at 3,629 kg, while 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is listed at 2,500 kg. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury is 782 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has the lower listed starting price at $75,200, compared with $129,990 for 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Luxury leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.