Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.6 seconds, compared with 6.2 seconds for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC. 2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD has the higher listed output at 340 hp; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is rated at 292 hp, a difference of 48 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC at 520 Nm and 2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD at 440 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD carries the longer listed range at 502 km, against 444 km for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC. 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC has the lower recorded consumption at 18.1 kWh/100km; 2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD is listed at 20.3 kWh/100km. 2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 190 kW, compared with 100 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 793 litres versus 495 litres, a difference of 298 litres. 2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD carries the higher towing rating at 1,360 kg, while 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is listed at 750 kg. 2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD is 312 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC has the lower listed starting price at $54,500, compared with $58,590 for 2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD. 2025 Cadillac Lyriq RWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.