Skip to content
Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD vs Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus
Key differences
- Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h (5.5 s vs 6.6 s).
- Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has more power (340 hp vs 256 hp).
- Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus has more cargo volume (889 L vs 769 L).
- Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus has the lower starting MSRP ($41,500 vs $43,900).
|
Chevrolet
2026 · Electric Suv
|
Mazda
2025 · Petrol Suv
|
| Performance |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
| Top Speed | 190 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power | 340 hp | 256 hp |
| Torque | 580 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency |
| Range | 480 km | — |
| Battery | 85 kWh | — |
| Fuel Tank | — | 58 L |
| Efficiency | 17.7 kWh/100km | 9 kWh/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 0 g/km | 206 g/km |
| DC Charging | 150 kW | — |
| Size & Capacity |
| Length | 4,837 mm | 4,741 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm | 203 mm |
| Cargo | 769 L | 889 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,200 kg | 1,740 kg |
| Towing | 680 kg | 1,588 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 12.2 m | 11.2 m |
| Starting MSRP | $43,900 | $41,500 |