Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD vs Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
Comparison winners
5 metrics
0-100 winner
Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD
5.5 s
Runner-up: 7.1 s
Range winner
Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
540 km
Runner-up: 480 km
Power winner
Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD
340 hp
Runner-up: 252 hp
Cargo winner
Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD
769 L
Runner-up: 413 L
Price winner
Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
$39,200
Runner-up: $43,900
Key differences
- Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h (5.5 s vs 7.1 s).
- Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range has more range (540 km vs 480 km).
- Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has more power (340 hp vs 252 hp).
- Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has more cargo volume (769 L vs 413 L).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5 s | 7.1 s |
| Top Speed | 190 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power | 340 hp | 252 hp |
| Torque | 580 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | 480 km | 540 km |
| Battery | 85 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Efficiency | 17.7 kWh/100km | 15.2 kWh/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 0 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | 150 kW | 200 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,837 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm | 171 mm |
| Cargo | 769 L | 413 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,200 kg | 2,020 kg |
| Towing | 680 kg | 1,500 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 12.2 m | 11.4 m |
| Starting MSRP | $43,900 | $39,200 |
