Chevrolet Equinox RS 1.5T vs Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus
6.6 s
Runner-up: 8.5 s
Power winner
Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus
256 hp
Runner-up: 175 hp
Cargo winner
Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus
889 L
Runner-up: 850 L
Price winner
Chevrolet Equinox RS 1.5T
$33,300
Runner-up: $41,500
Key differences
- Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus is quicker from 0-100 km/h (6.6 s vs 8.5 s).
- Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus has more power (256 hp vs 175 hp).
- Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus has more cargo volume (889 L vs 850 L).
- Chevrolet Equinox RS 1.5T has the lower starting MSRP ($33,300 vs $41,500).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5 s | 6.6 s |
| Top Speed | 195 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power | 175 hp | 256 hp |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Fuel Tank | 56 L | 58 L |
| Efficiency | 7.6 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 173 g/km | 206 g/km |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,643 mm | 4,741 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm | 203 mm |
| Cargo | 850 L | 889 L |
| Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,740 kg |
| Towing | 680 kg | 1,588 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 11.5 m | 11.2 m |
| Starting MSRP | $33,300 | $41,500 |
