Chevrolet Equinox RS 1.5T vs Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
3.6 s
Runner-up: 8.5 s
Power winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
428 hp
Runner-up: 175 hp
Cargo winner
Chevrolet Equinox RS 1.5T
850 L
Runner-up: 318 L
Price winner
Chevrolet Equinox RS 1.5T
$33,300
Runner-up: $41,200
Key differences
- Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is quicker from 0-100 km/h (3.6 s vs 8.5 s).
- Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance has more power (428 hp vs 175 hp).
- Chevrolet Equinox RS 1.5T has more cargo volume (850 L vs 318 L).
- Chevrolet Equinox RS 1.5T has the lower starting MSRP ($33,300 vs $41,200).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5 s | 3.6 s |
| Top Speed | 195 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power | 175 hp | 428 hp |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 543 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | — | 438 km |
| Battery | — | 69 kWh |
| Fuel Tank | 56 L | — |
| Efficiency | 7.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 173 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | — | 153 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,643 mm | 4,233 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm | 175 mm |
| Cargo | 850 L | 318 L |
| Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,900 kg |
| Towing | 680 kg | 1,000 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 11.5 m | 10.6 m |
| Starting MSRP | $33,300 | $41,200 |
