Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.8 seconds, compared with 7.5 seconds for 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the higher listed output at 327 hp; 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225 is rated at 225 hp, a difference of 102 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura at 500 Nm and 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225 at 360 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura carries the longer listed range at 63 km, against 55 km for 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225. Their recorded consumption is identical at 1.5 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 570 litres versus 460 litres, a difference of 110 litres. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura carries the higher towing rating at 2,500 kg, while 2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225 is listed at 1,250 kg. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura is 245 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Citroën C5 Aircross PHEV 225 has the lower listed starting price at $41,800, compared with $52,500 for 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.