Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD vs BMW iX3 30 eDrive

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD 5.1 s Runner-up: 6.8 s
Range winner Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD 530 km Runner-up: 465 km
Power winner Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD 346 hp Runner-up: 281 hp
Cargo winner BMW iX3 30 eDrive 520 L Runner-up: 519 L
Price winner Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD $49,500 Runner-up: $58,675

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD against the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.1 seconds, compared with 6.8 seconds for 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the higher listed output at 346 hp; 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive is rated at 281 hp, a difference of 65 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD at 580 Nm and 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive at 400 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 530 km, against 465 km for 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive. 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive has the lower recorded consumption at 14.8 kWh/100km; 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is listed at 18.4 kWh/100km. Both list the same maximum DC charging power of 150 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 520 litres versus 519 litres, a difference of 1 litres. 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive carries the higher towing rating at 1,200 kg, while 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is listed at 750 kg. 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive is 16 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the lower listed starting price at $49,500, compared with $58,675 for 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD2026 BMW iX3 30 eDrive2025
Performance
0-100 km/h5.1 s6.8 s
Top Speed180 km/h180 km/h
Power346 hp281 hp
Torque580 Nm400 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range530 km465 km
Battery98.7 kWh68.7 kWh
Efficiency18.4 kWh/100km14.8 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging150 kW150 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,739 mm4,755 mm
Ground Clearance150 mm190 mm
Cargo519 L520 L
Curb Weight2,260 kg2,060 kg
Towing750 kg1,200 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle11.6 m12.1 m
Starting MSRP$49,500$58,675

Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD vs BMW iX3 30 eDrive questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 5.1 seconds, versus 6.8 seconds for 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

Both cars have the same listed top speed of 180 km/h, approximately 112 mph.

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has more power at 346 hp, a 65 hp advantage over 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive.

Which has more range, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the longer listed range at 530 km (329 miles), versus 465 km (289 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the larger listed battery at 98.7 kWh, compared with 68.7 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive has more listed cargo space at 520 litres (18.4 cu ft), versus 519 litres (18.3 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive has the higher listed towing capacity at 1,200 kg (2,646 lb), compared with 750 kg (1,653 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is heavier at 2,260 kg (4,982 lb), while 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive is listed at 2,060 kg (4,542 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $49,500 USD, compared with $58,675 USD for 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD or the 2025 BMW iX3 30 eDrive?

2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.