Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium vs Honda CR-V Sport-L Hybrid AWD
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Honda CR-V Sport-L Hybrid AWD
8.0 s
Runner-up: 9.8 s
Power winner
Honda CR-V Sport-L Hybrid AWD
204 hp
Runner-up: 125 hp
Cargo winner
Honda CR-V Sport-L Hybrid AWD
587 L
Runner-up: 456 L
Price winner
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium
$27,500
Runner-up: $38,600
Key differences
- Honda CR-V Sport-L Hybrid AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h (8.0 s vs 9.8 s).
- Honda CR-V Sport-L Hybrid AWD has more power (204 hp vs 125 hp).
- Honda CR-V Sport-L Hybrid AWD has more cargo volume (587 L vs 456 L).
- Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium has the lower starting MSRP ($27,500 vs $38,600).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 9.8 s | 8.0 s |
| Top Speed | 192 km/h | 185 km/h |
| Power | 125 hp | 204 hp |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 335 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Fuel Tank | 42 L | 53 L |
| Efficiency | 5.6 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 127 g/km | 153 g/km |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,207 mm | 4,703 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 148 mm | 198 mm |
| Cargo | 456 L | 587 L |
| Curb Weight | 1,270 kg | 1,780 kg |
| Towing | — | 750 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 10.6 m | 11.6 m |
| Starting MSRP | $27,500 | $38,600 |
