Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium vs Kia Niro EV Long Range
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Kia Niro EV Long Range
7.8 s
Runner-up: 9.8 s
Power winner
Kia Niro EV Long Range
204 hp
Runner-up: 125 hp
Cargo winner
Kia Niro EV Long Range
475 L
Runner-up: 456 L
Price winner
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium
$27,500
Runner-up: $39,590
Key differences
- Kia Niro EV Long Range is quicker from 0-100 km/h (7.8 s vs 9.8 s).
- Kia Niro EV Long Range has more power (204 hp vs 125 hp).
- Kia Niro EV Long Range has more cargo volume (475 L vs 456 L).
- Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium has the lower starting MSRP ($27,500 vs $39,590).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 9.8 s | 7.8 s |
| Top Speed | 192 km/h | 167 km/h |
| Power | 125 hp | 204 hp |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | — | 463 km |
| Battery | — | 64.8 kWh |
| Fuel Tank | 42 L | — |
| Efficiency | 5.6 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 127 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | — | 80 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,207 mm | 4,420 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 148 mm | 170 mm |
| Cargo | 456 L | 475 L |
| Curb Weight | 1,270 kg | 1,730 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 10.6 m | 10.6 m |
| Starting MSRP | $27,500 | $39,590 |
