Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 9.8 seconds, compared with 10.1 seconds for 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid. 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid has the higher listed output at 143 hp; 2025 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium is rated at 125 hp, a difference of 18 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium at 210 Nm and 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid at 205 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid has the lower recorded consumption at 5.2 L/100km; 2025 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium is listed at 5.6 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 456 litres versus 354 litres, a difference of 102 litres. 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid is 3 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid has the lower listed starting price at $25,200, compared with $27,500 for 2025 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium. The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.