GMC Acadia AT4 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI RS 4x4
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI RS 4x4
6.2 s
Runner-up: 6.5 s
Power winner
GMC Acadia AT4
328 hp
Runner-up: 265 hp
Cargo winner
GMC Acadia AT4
625 L
Runner-up: 340 L
Price winner
GMC Acadia AT4
$48,100
Runner-up: $48,500
Key differences
- Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI RS 4x4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h (6.2 s vs 6.5 s).
- GMC Acadia AT4 has more power (328 hp vs 265 hp).
- GMC Acadia AT4 has more cargo volume (625 L vs 340 L).
- GMC Acadia AT4 has the lower starting MSRP ($48,100 vs $48,500).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
| Top Speed | 200 km/h | 232 km/h |
| Power | 328 hp | 265 hp |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Fuel Tank | 71 L | 58 L |
| Efficiency | 10.2 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 232 g/km | 187 g/km |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 5,004 mm | 4,758 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 215 mm | 185 mm |
| Cargo | 625 L | 340 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,041 kg | 1,790 kg |
| Towing | 2,268 kg | 2,200 kg |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Turning Circle | 12.1 m | 11.8 m |
| Starting MSRP | $48,100 | $48,500 |