Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 7.9 seconds, compared with 8.5 seconds for 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD. 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD has the higher listed output at 265 hp; 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is rated at 248 hp, a difference of 17 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC at 450 Nm and 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD at 367 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC carries the longer listed range at 64 km, against 62 km for 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD. 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 1.2 L/100km; 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is listed at 2.0 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 558 litres versus 464 litres, a difference of 94 litres. 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC carries the higher towing rating at 1,588 kg, while 2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD is listed at 1,350 kg. 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is 210 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Hyundai Tucson PHEV 1.6 T-GDi PHEV Limited AWD has the lower listed starting price at $40,150, compared with $44,790 for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC. The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.