Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 6.5 seconds, compared with 8.0 seconds for 2025 Jeep Compass Latitude 2.0T. 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium has the higher listed output at 340 hp; 2025 Jeep Compass Latitude 2.0T is rated at 200 hp, a difference of 140 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium at 500 Nm and 2025 Jeep Compass Latitude 2.0T at 340 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Jeep Compass Latitude 2.0T has the lower recorded consumption at 8.0 L/100km; 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium is listed at 9.8 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Jeep Compass Latitude 2.0T provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 438 litres versus 400 litres, a difference of 38 litres. 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium carries the higher towing rating at 2,268 kg, while 2025 Jeep Compass Latitude 2.0T is listed at 907 kg. 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium is 695 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Jeep Compass Latitude 2.0T has the lower listed starting price at $33,695, compared with $48,000 for 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium. 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.