Kia Niro EV Wind vs Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
Comparison winners
5 metrics
0-100 winner
Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
7.1 s
Runner-up: 7.8 s
Range winner
Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
540 km
Runner-up: 460 km
Power winner
Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
252 hp
Runner-up: 204 hp
Cargo winner
Kia Niro EV Wind
475 L
Runner-up: 413 L
Price winner
Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range
$39,200
Runner-up: $40,875
Key differences
- Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range is quicker from 0-100 km/h (7.1 s vs 7.8 s).
- Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range has more range (540 km vs 460 km).
- Volvo C40 Single Motor Extended Range has more power (252 hp vs 204 hp).
- Kia Niro EV Wind has more cargo volume (475 L vs 413 L).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.1 s |
| Top Speed | 167 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power | 204 hp | 252 hp |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | 460 km | 540 km |
| Battery | 64.8 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Efficiency | 14.1 kWh/100km | 15.2 kWh/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 0 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | 80 kW | 200 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,420 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 160 mm | 171 mm |
| Cargo | 475 L | 413 L |
| Curb Weight | 1,757 kg | 2,020 kg |
| Towing | 750 kg | 1,500 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 10.6 m | 11.4 m |
| Starting MSRP | $40,875 | $39,200 |
