Skip to content
Kia Niro EV Long Range vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium
Key differences
- Kia Niro EV Long Range is quicker from 0-100 km/h (7.8 s vs 9.8 s).
- Kia Niro EV Long Range has more power (204 hp vs 125 hp).
- Kia Niro EV Long Range has more cargo volume (475 L vs 456 L).
- Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium has the lower starting MSRP ($27,500 vs $39,590).
|
Kia
2024 · Hybrid Suv
|
Ford
2025 · Hybrid Suv
|
| Performance |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8 s | 9.8 s |
| Top Speed | 167 km/h | 192 km/h |
| Power | 204 hp | 125 hp |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency |
| Range | 463 km | — |
| Battery | 64.8 kWh | — |
| Fuel Tank | — | 42 L |
| Efficiency | 14 kWh/100km | 5.6 kWh/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 0 g/km | 127 g/km |
| DC Charging | 80 kW | — |
| Size & Capacity |
| Length | 4,420 mm | 4,207 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 170 mm | 148 mm |
| Cargo | 475 L | 456 L |
| Curb Weight | 1,730 kg | 1,270 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 10.6 m | 10.6 m |
| Starting MSRP | $39,590 | $27,500 |