Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.4 seconds, compared with 5.7 seconds for 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e. 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e has the higher listed output at 510 hp; 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e is rated at 389 hp, a difference of 121 hp. The torque figures follow 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e at 750 Nm and 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e at 600 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e carries the longer listed range at 113 km, against 81 km for 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e. 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e has the lower recorded consumption at 1.9 L/100km; 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e is listed at 2.8 L/100km. 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 50 kW, compared with 7 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 647 litres versus 500 litres, a difference of 147 litres. 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e carries the higher towing rating at 3,000 kg, while 2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e is listed at 2,700 kg. 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e is 24 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 BMW X5 xDrive45e has the lower listed starting price at $68,395, compared with $106,200 for 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e. 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.