Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD vs Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD 3.6 s Runner-up: 5.6 s
Range winner Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD 748 km Runner-up: 498 km
Power winner Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD 828 hp Runner-up: 408 hp
Cargo winner Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD 595 L Runner-up: 569 L
Price winner Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro $75,200 Runner-up: $94,900

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD against the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.6 seconds, compared with 5.6 seconds for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the higher listed output at 828 hp; 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is rated at 408 hp, a difference of 420 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD at 1,232 Nm and 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro at 664 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD carries the longer listed range at 748 km, against 498 km for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 18.2 kWh/100km; 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is listed at 19.8 kWh/100km. 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 400 kW, compared with 170 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 595 litres versus 569 litres, a difference of 26 litres. Their listed towing capacities are equal at 2,500 kg. 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD is 120 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has the lower listed starting price at $75,200, compared with $94,900 for 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD. 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro2026
Performance
0-100 km/h3.6 s5.6 s
Top Speed250 km/h200 km/h
Power828 hp408 hp
Torque1,232 Nm664 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range748 km498 km
Battery123 kWh106 kWh
Efficiency18.2 kWh/100km19.8 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging400 kW170 kW
Size & Capacity
Length5,035 mm4,915 mm
Ground Clearance178 mm172 mm
Cargo595 L569 L
Curb Weight2,743 kg2,595 kg
Towing2,500 kg2,500 kg
Seats75
Turning Circle11.7 m12.2 m
Starting MSRP$94,900$75,200

Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD vs Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 3.6 seconds, versus 5.6 seconds for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the higher listed top speed at 250 km/h (155 mph), compared with 200 km/h (124 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has more power at 828 hp, a 420 hp advantage over 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro.

Which has more range, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the longer listed range at 748 km (465 miles), versus 498 km (309 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the larger listed battery at 123.0 kWh, compared with 106.0 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has more listed cargo space at 595 litres (21.0 cu ft), versus 569 litres (20.1 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

Both cars have the same listed towing capacity of 2,500 kg (5,512 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD is heavier at 2,743 kg (6,047 lb), while 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is listed at 2,595 kg (5,721 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $75,200 USD, compared with $94,900 USD for 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.