Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD vs Rivian R1S Dual Standard

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Tie 3.6 s Same value
Range winner Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD 748 km Runner-up: 488 km
Power winner Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD 828 hp Runner-up: 600 hp
Cargo winner Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD 595 L Runner-up: 498 L
Price winner Rivian R1S Dual Standard $75,900 Runner-up: $94,900

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD against the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

Both cars record the same 0-100 km/h time of 3.6 seconds. 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the higher listed output at 828 hp; 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard is rated at 600 hp, a difference of 228 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD at 1,232 Nm and 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard at 878 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD carries the longer listed range at 748 km, against 488 km for 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard. 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 18.2 kWh/100km; 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard is listed at 20.5 kWh/100km. 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 400 kW, compared with 220 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 595 litres versus 498 litres, a difference of 97 litres. 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard carries the higher towing rating at 3,175 kg, while 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD is listed at 2,500 kg. 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard is 5 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard has the lower listed starting price at $75,900, compared with $94,900 for 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD. 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard2026
Performance
0-100 km/h3.6 s3.6 s
Top Speed250 km/h201 km/h
Power828 hp600 hp
Torque1,232 Nm878 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range748 km488 km
Battery123 kWh100 kWh
Efficiency18.2 kWh/100km20.5 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging400 kW220 kW
Size & Capacity
Length5,035 mm5,040 mm
Ground Clearance178 mm226 mm
Cargo595 L498 L
Curb Weight2,743 kg2,870 kg
Towing2,500 kg3,175 kg
Seats77
Turning Circle11.7 m12.9 m
Starting MSRP$94,900$75,900

Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD vs Rivian R1S Dual Standard questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

Both cars have the same listed 0-100 km/h time of 3.6 seconds.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the higher listed top speed at 250 km/h (155 mph), compared with 201 km/h (125 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has more power at 828 hp, a 228 hp advantage over 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard.

Which has more range, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the longer listed range at 748 km (465 miles), versus 488 km (303 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has the larger listed battery at 123.0 kWh, compared with 100.0 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD has more listed cargo space at 595 litres (21.0 cu ft), versus 498 litres (17.6 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard has the higher listed towing capacity at 3,175 kg (7,000 lb), compared with 2,500 kg (5,512 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard is heavier at 2,870 kg (6,327 lb), while 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD is listed at 2,743 kg (6,047 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $75,900 USD, compared with $94,900 USD for 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD or the 2026 Rivian R1S Dual Standard?

2026 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.