Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G vs Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid

Comparison winners

4 metrics
0-100 winner Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G 9.6 s Runner-up: 10.1 s
Power winner Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G 150 hp Runner-up: 143 hp
Cargo winner Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G 430 L Runner-up: 354 L
Price winner Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G $24,325 Runner-up: $25,200

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G against the 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. One uses a petrol powertrain and the other a hybrid system, so range and consumption figures need to be read in that context.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 9.6 seconds, compared with 10.1 seconds for 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid. 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G has the higher listed output at 150 hp; 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid is rated at 143 hp, a difference of 7 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G at 213 Nm and 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid at 205 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

Range and energy-use figures are either not shared by both cars or not directly comparable across these powertrain types.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 430 litres versus 354 litres, a difference of 76 litres. 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G is 185 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G has the lower listed starting price at $24,325, compared with $25,200 for 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid. 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid2025
Performance
0-100 km/h9.6 s10.1 s
Top Speed196 km/h170 km/h
Power150 hp143 hp
Torque213 Nm205 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Fuel Tank48 L46 L
Efficiency6.5 L/100km5.2 L/100km
CO2 Emissions148 g/km118 g/km
Size & Capacity
Length4,395 mm4,210 mm
Ground Clearance175 mm170 mm
Cargo430 L354 L
Curb Weight1,360 kg1,350 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle10.6 m10.4 m
Starting MSRP$24,325$25,200

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G vs Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G or the 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid?

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 9.6 seconds, versus 10.1 seconds for 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G or the 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid?

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G has the higher listed top speed at 196 km/h (122 mph), compared with 170 km/h (106 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G or the 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid?

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G has more power at 150 hp, a 7 hp advantage over 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G or the 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid?

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G has more listed cargo space at 430 litres (15.2 cu ft), versus 354 litres (12.5 cu ft).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G or the 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid?

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G is heavier at 1,360 kg (2,998 lb), while 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid is listed at 1,350 kg (2,976 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G or the 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid?

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $24,325 USD, compared with $25,200 USD for 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G or the 2025 Nissan Juke 1.6 Hybrid?

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.