Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 7.0 seconds, compared with 7.5 seconds for 2025 GMC Terrain AT4. 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo has the higher listed output at 256 hp; 2025 GMC Terrain AT4 is rated at 252 hp, a difference of 4 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo at 434 Nm and 2025 GMC Terrain AT4 at 370 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 GMC Terrain AT4 has the lower recorded consumption at 9.0 L/100km; 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo is listed at 9.4 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 GMC Terrain AT4 provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 648 litres versus 572 litres, a difference of 76 litres. Their listed towing capacities are equal at 1,588 kg. 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo is 82 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 GMC Terrain AT4 has the lower listed starting price at $38,400, compared with $40,900 for 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo. The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.