Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 7.0 seconds, compared with 8.3 seconds for 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T. 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo has the higher listed output at 256 hp; 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T is rated at 201 hp, a difference of 55 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo at 434 Nm and 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T at 305 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T has the lower recorded consumption at 7.6 L/100km; 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo is listed at 9.4 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 879 litres versus 572 litres, a difference of 307 litres. 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo carries the higher towing rating at 1,588 kg, while 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T is listed at 680 kg. 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo is 92 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T has the lower listed starting price at $37,780, compared with $40,900 for 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo. 2025 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.