Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura vs Audi Q4 e-tron 40

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura 5.8 s Runner-up: 6.7 s
Range winner Audi Q4 e-tron 40 535 km Runner-up: 63 km
Power winner Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura 327 hp Runner-up: 286 hp
Cargo winner Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura 570 L Runner-up: 520 L
Price winner Audi Q4 e-tron 40 $50,800 Runner-up: $52,500

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura against the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. One uses a plug-in hybrid powertrain and the other a battery-electric system, so range and consumption figures need to be read in that context.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.8 seconds, compared with 6.7 seconds for 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the higher listed output at 327 hp; 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40 is rated at 286 hp, a difference of 41 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura at 500 Nm and 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40 at 310 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40 carries the longer listed range at 535 km, against 63 km for 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 570 litres versus 520 litres, a difference of 50 litres. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura carries the higher towing rating at 2,500 kg, while 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40 is listed at 1,200 kg. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura is 157 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40 has the lower listed starting price at $50,800, compared with $52,500 for 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 402025
Performance
0-100 km/h5.8 s6.7 s
Top Speed200 km/h180 km/h
Power327 hp286 hp
Torque500 Nm310 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range63 km535 km
Battery17.8 kWh77 kWh
Fuel Tank50 L
Efficiency1.5 L/100km16.3 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions33 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging175 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,745 mm4,588 mm
Ground Clearance195 mm180 mm
Cargo570 L520 L
Curb Weight2,065 kg2,055 kg
Towing2,500 kg1,200 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle11.3 m10.2 m
Starting MSRP$52,500$50,800

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura vs Audi Q4 e-tron 40 questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 5.8 seconds, versus 6.7 seconds for 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the higher listed top speed at 200 km/h (124 mph), compared with 180 km/h (112 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has more power at 327 hp, a 41 hp advantage over 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40.

Which has more range, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40 has the longer listed range at 535 km (332 miles), versus 63 km (39 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40 has the larger listed battery at 77.0 kWh, compared with 17.8 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has more listed cargo space at 570 litres (20.1 cu ft), versus 520 litres (18.4 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the higher listed towing capacity at 2,500 kg (5,512 lb), compared with 1,200 kg (2,646 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura is heavier at 2,065 kg (4,553 lb), while 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40 is listed at 2,055 kg (4,530 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40 has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $50,800 USD, compared with $52,500 USD for 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura or the 2025 Audi Q4 e-tron 40?

2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.