Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Li Auto L7 Max has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.3 seconds, compared with 6.5 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium. 2025 Li Auto L7 Max has the higher listed output at 449 hp; 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium is rated at 340 hp, a difference of 109 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Li Auto L7 Max at 620 Nm and 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium at 500 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
Range and energy-use figures are either not shared by both cars or not directly comparable across these powertrain types.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Li Auto L7 Max provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 606 litres versus 400 litres, a difference of 206 litres. 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium carries the higher towing rating at 2,268 kg, while 2025 Li Auto L7 Max is listed at 2,000 kg. 2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium is 49 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium has the lower listed starting price at $48,000, compared with $58,000 for 2025 Li Auto L7 Max. 2025 Li Auto L7 Max leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.