Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance 3.4 s Runner-up: 6.3 s
Range winner Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e 103 km Runner-up: 13 km
Power winner Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance 680 hp Runner-up: 313 hp
Cargo winner Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e 540 L Runner-up: 350 L
Price winner Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e $69,900 Runner-up: $87,500

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance against the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e. Both belong to the sedan class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use plug-in hybrid powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.4 seconds, compared with 6.3 seconds for 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e. 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance has the higher listed output at 680 hp; 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e is rated at 313 hp, a difference of 367 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance at 1,020 Nm and 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e at 550 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e carries the longer listed range at 103 km, against 13 km for 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance. 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e has the lower recorded consumption at 0.7 L/100km; 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance is listed at 6.9 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 540 litres versus 350 litres, a difference of 190 litres. 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e is 129 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e has the lower listed starting price at $69,900, compared with $87,500 for 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance. 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance2026 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e2025
Performance
0-100 km/h3.4 s6.3 s
Top Speed280 km/h245 km/h
Power680 hp313 hp
Torque1,020 Nm550 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range13 km103 km
Battery6.1 kWh25.4 kWh
Fuel Tank66 L52 L
Efficiency6.9 L/100km0.7 L/100km
CO2 Emissions156 g/km16 g/km
DC Charging—60 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,820 mm4,949 mm
Ground Clearance125 mm140 mm
Cargo350 L540 L
Curb Weight2,111 kg1,990 kg
Towing—2,100 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle11.4 m11.8 m
Starting MSRP$87,500$69,900

Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e?

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 3.4 seconds, versus 6.3 seconds for 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e?

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance has the higher listed top speed at 280 km/h (174 mph), compared with 245 km/h (152 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e?

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance has more power at 680 hp, a 367 hp advantage over 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e.

Which has more range, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e?

2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e has the longer listed range at 103 km (64 miles), versus 13 km (8 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e?

2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e has the larger listed battery at 25.4 kWh, compared with 6.1 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e?

2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e has more listed cargo space at 540 litres (19.1 cu ft), versus 350 litres (12.4 cu ft).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e?

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance is heavier at 2,111 kg (4,654 lb), while 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e is listed at 1,990 kg (4,387 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e?

2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $69,900 USD, compared with $87,500 USD for 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e?

2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 300 e leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.