Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance vs Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance 3.4 s Runner-up: 7.7 s
Range winner Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K 100 km Runner-up: 13 km
Power winner Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance 680 hp Runner-up: 204 hp
Cargo winner Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K 645 L Runner-up: 350 L
Price winner Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K $45,000 Runner-up: $87,500

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance against the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K. Both belong to the sedan class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use plug-in hybrid powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.4 seconds, compared with 7.7 seconds for 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K. 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance has the higher listed output at 680 hp; 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K is rated at 204 hp, a difference of 476 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance at 1,020 Nm and 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K at 350 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K carries the longer listed range at 100 km, against 13 km for 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance. 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K has the lower recorded consumption at 1.1 L/100km; 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance is listed at 6.9 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 645 litres versus 350 litres, a difference of 295 litres. 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K is 92 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K has the lower listed starting price at $45,000, compared with $87,500 for 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance. 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance2026 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K2025
Performance
0-100 km/h3.4 s7.7 s
Top Speed280 km/h224 km/h
Power680 hp204 hp
Torque1,020 Nm350 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range13 km100 km
Battery6.1 kWh19.7 kWh
Fuel Tank66 L45 L
Efficiency6.9 L/100km1.1 L/100km
CO2 Emissions156 g/km25 g/km
Size & Capacity
Length4,820 mm4,912 mm
Ground Clearance125 mm140 mm
Cargo350 L645 L
Curb Weight2,111 kg1,735 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle11.4 m11.3 m
Starting MSRP$87,500$45,000

Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance vs Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K?

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 3.4 seconds, versus 7.7 seconds for 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K?

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance has the higher listed top speed at 280 km/h (174 mph), compared with 224 km/h (139 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K?

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance has more power at 680 hp, a 476 hp advantage over 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K.

Which has more range, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K?

2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K has the longer listed range at 100 km (62 miles), versus 13 km (8 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K?

2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K has the larger listed battery at 19.7 kWh, compared with 6.1 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K?

2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K has more listed cargo space at 645 litres (22.8 cu ft), versus 350 litres (12.4 cu ft).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K?

2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance is heavier at 2,111 kg (4,654 lb), while 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K is listed at 1,735 kg (3,825 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K?

2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $45,000 USD, compared with $87,500 USD for 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance or the 2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K?

2025 Skoda Superb 1.5 TSI iV PHEV L&K leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.