Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.1 seconds, compared with 8.6 seconds for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the higher listed output at 346 hp; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ is rated at 190 hp, a difference of 156 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD at 580 Nm and 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ at 385 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 530 km, against 528 km for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+. 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ has the lower recorded consumption at 15.7 kWh/100km; 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is listed at 18.4 kWh/100km. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 150 kW, compared with 100 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 519 litres versus 340 litres, a difference of 179 litres. Their listed towing capacities are equal at 750 kg. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD is 276 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD has the lower listed starting price at $49,500, compared with $50,600 for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+. 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.