Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 4.8 seconds, compared with 6.2 seconds for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed output at 351 hp; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is rated at 292 hp, a difference of 59 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC at 520 Nm and 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD at 493 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 574 km, against 444 km for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 14.7 kWh/100km; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is listed at 18.1 kWh/100km. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 250 kW, compared with 100 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 854 litres versus 495 litres, a difference of 359 litres. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD carries the higher towing rating at 1,600 kg, while 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is listed at 750 kg. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is 113 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower listed starting price at $45,990, compared with $54,500 for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.