Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC vs Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD 3.5 s Runner-up: 6.2 s
Range winner Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC 444 km Runner-up: 440 km
Power winner Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD 595 hp Runner-up: 292 hp
Cargo winner Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD 863 L Runner-up: 495 L
Price winner Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC $54,500 Runner-up: $65,600

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC against the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.5 seconds, compared with 6.2 seconds for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the higher listed output at 595 hp; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is rated at 292 hp, a difference of 303 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD at 880 Nm and 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC at 520 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC carries the longer listed range at 444 km, against 440 km for 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC has the lower recorded consumption at 18.1 kWh/100km; 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is listed at 23.2 kWh/100km. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 190 kW, compared with 100 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 863 litres versus 495 litres, a difference of 368 litres. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD carries the higher towing rating at 1,588 kg, while 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is listed at 750 kg. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is 199 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC has the lower listed starting price at $54,500, compared with $65,600 for 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD2026
Performance
0-100 km/h6.2 s3.5 s
Top Speed160 km/h200 km/h
Power292 hp595 hp
Torque520 Nm880 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range444 km440 km
Battery70.5 kWh102 kWh
Efficiency18.1 kWh/100km23.2 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging100 kW190 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,684 mm4,883 mm
Ground Clearance164 mm172 mm
Cargo495 L863 L
Curb Weight2,175 kg2,560 kg
Towing750 kg1,588 kg
Seats75
Turning Circle11.8 m12.2 m
Starting MSRP$54,500$65,600

Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC vs Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 3.5 seconds, versus 6.2 seconds for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the higher listed top speed at 200 km/h (124 mph), compared with 160 km/h (99 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has more power at 595 hp, a 303 hp advantage over 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC.

Which has more range, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC has the longer listed range at 444 km (276 miles), versus 440 km (273 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the larger listed battery at 102.0 kWh, compared with 70.5 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has more listed cargo space at 863 litres (30.5 cu ft), versus 495 litres (17.5 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the higher listed towing capacity at 1,588 kg (3,501 lb), compared with 750 kg (1,653 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is heavier at 2,560 kg (5,644 lb), while 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is listed at 2,175 kg (4,795 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $54,500 USD, compared with $65,600 USD for 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC or the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.