Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 BMW iX2 xDrive30 has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.6 seconds, compared with 6.2 seconds for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC. 2025 BMW iX2 xDrive30 has the higher listed output at 313 hp; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is rated at 292 hp, a difference of 21 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC at 520 Nm and 2025 BMW iX2 xDrive30 at 494 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 BMW iX2 xDrive30 carries the longer listed range at 449 km, against 444 km for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC. 2025 BMW iX2 xDrive30 has the lower recorded consumption at 14.8 kWh/100km; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is listed at 18.1 kWh/100km. 2025 BMW iX2 xDrive30 has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 130 kW, compared with 100 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 495 litres versus 470 litres, a difference of 25 litres. 2025 BMW iX2 xDrive30 carries the higher towing rating at 1,200 kg, while 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is listed at 750 kg. 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is 130 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC has the lower listed starting price at $54,500, compared with $56,900 for 2025 BMW iX2 xDrive30. 2025 BMW iX2 xDrive30 leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.