Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 220hp Techno has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 7.4 seconds, compared with 8.6 seconds for 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury. 2025 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 220hp Techno has the higher listed output at 220 hp; 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury is rated at 177 hp, a difference of 43 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 220hp Techno at 300 Nm and 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury at 280 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 220hp Techno carries the longer listed range at 450 km, against 440 km for 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury. 2025 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 220hp Techno has the lower recorded consumption at 13.3 kWh/100km; 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury is listed at 16.5 kWh/100km. 2025 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 220hp Techno has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 130 kW, compared with 92 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 470 litres versus 440 litres, a difference of 30 litres. 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury is 123 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury has the lower listed starting price at $30,400, compared with $40,500 for 2025 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 220hp Techno. 2025 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 220hp Techno leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.