MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury vs Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh 7.8 s Runner-up: 8.6 s
Range winner Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh 490 km Runner-up: 440 km
Power winner Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh 218 hp Runner-up: 177 hp
Cargo winner MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury 470 L Runner-up: 466 L
Price winner MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury $30,400 Runner-up: $35,550

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury against the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 7.8 seconds, compared with 8.6 seconds for 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the higher listed output at 218 hp; 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury is rated at 177 hp, a difference of 41 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury at 280 Nm and 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh at 255 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh carries the longer listed range at 490 km, against 440 km for 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the lower recorded consumption at 13.3 kWh/100km; 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury is listed at 16.5 kWh/100km. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 102 kW, compared with 92 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 470 litres versus 466 litres, a difference of 4 litres. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh carries the higher towing rating at 750 kg, while 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury is listed at 500 kg. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh is 32 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury has the lower listed starting price at $30,400, compared with $35,550 for 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh. 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh2025
Performance
0-100 km/h8.6 s7.8 s
Top Speed170 km/h170 km/h
Power177 hp218 hp
Torque280 Nm255 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range440 km490 km
Battery72.6 kWh65.4 kWh
Efficiency16.5 kWh/100km13.3 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging92 kW102 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,323 mm4,355 mm
Ground Clearance176 mm178 mm
Cargo470 L466 L
Curb Weight1,645 kg1,720 kg
Towing500 kg750 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle10.4 m10.6 m
Starting MSRP$30,400$35,550

MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury vs Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 7.8 seconds, versus 8.6 seconds for 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

Both cars have the same listed top speed of 170 km/h, approximately 106 mph.

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has more power at 218 hp, a 41 hp advantage over 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury.

Which has more range, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the longer listed range at 490 km (304 miles), versus 440 km (273 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury has the larger listed battery at 72.6 kWh, compared with 65.4 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury has more listed cargo space at 470 litres (16.6 cu ft), versus 466 litres (16.5 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh has the higher listed towing capacity at 750 kg (1,653 lb), compared with 500 kg (1,102 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh is heavier at 1,720 kg (3,792 lb), while 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury is listed at 1,645 kg (3,627 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $30,400 USD, compared with $35,550 USD for 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 MG ZS EV Long Range Luxury or the 2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh?

2025 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.