Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 8.3 seconds, compared with 9.6 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G. 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T has the higher listed output at 201 hp; 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G is rated at 150 hp, a difference of 51 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T at 305 Nm and 2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G at 213 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G has the lower recorded consumption at 6.5 L/100km; 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T is listed at 7.6 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 879 litres versus 430 litres, a difference of 449 litres. 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T is 253 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-G has the lower listed starting price at $24,325, compared with $37,780 for 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T. 2025 Nissan Rogue SL 1.5T leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.